Court of Appeal of Vaasa 19 February 2015:

Hagar Nordstrom

Robert Liljenfeldt

Petteri Korhonen

 

ANNELI AUER AND JENS KUKKA SEX OFFENSE CHARGE

 

"A week before the end of the deadline for the prosecution, prosecutor Jouko Saario from the Western Finland Prosecutor's Office announced that he was withdrawing from the case. Saario said at the time that the decision to withdraw was influenced by the uproar in the media about his possible obstruction in the Auer case."

 

If you look at what kind of nonsense Auer's sexual crime charges are, I'm pretty sure that Jouko Saario's morals simply didn't allow him to accuse Auer of completely baseless charges.

 

But what really interests me is how fragile Heli Haapalehdo is when it comes to morals when he has become the prosecutor in this case.

 

It is entirely up to me to guess whether they are trying to use only the credibility of the girl from "Bodom" so that Auer's murder can be credibly turned into something else, such as sexual crimes in this case. Of course, in terms of corruption, this would be like Patria's Uganda gig, which means the conviction of numerous innocent people in Finland.

https://www.iltalehti.fi/uutiset/a/2014061218396099

 

"What is significant about the Court of Appeal's judgment is that it was unanimous in its decision, unlike the District Court of Varsinais-Suomen, which had to vote on the judgment."

Does anyone else still want to go to the Finnish courts?

This has just been a real turning point, with the taxi driver accused of sexual crimes against children, which seems to be as long as the business plan of a motorcycle club.

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-6707470

 

 

Charges of sexual crimes

When the list is this long, it doesn't go through even for me, even if it's a woman who murdered her husband. This is like Trump's manhunt in America where the charges are the most incredible fabricated claims that have happened since the murder. I don't think that Auer would have changed so much even after the murder, but I will come back later to Auer's car chase, which makes no sense and why it was done.

 

The list of charges

The gruesome indictment was only published on February 15, 2012, the deadline for filing the indictment:

According to the subpoena, Auri was asked to be punished for these acts:

- 3 charges, aggravated sexual abuse of a child

- 3 charges, forcing a sexual act

- aggravated rape

- 3 charges, aggravated assault

- 2 charges, assault

- illegal threat

- animal protection crime

 

 

More than 50 witnesses

These witnesses are psychology experts who have interviewed children at Turku University Hospital. This area in Finnish nursing has been at the center of my own studies when I have studied medical brain examinations performed on patients in mental hospitals under the guise of medically non-existent diseases, in order to avoid the law when illegal medical examinations are carried out on people in the name of the researchers' own academic careers.

 

This action from psychiatry is completely based on a mutu feeling, which is interpreted by interpreting the patient's behavior, which leaves a big error in terms of interpretation, especially if it is a problem citizen convicted of murder.

 

With reference to the previous ones and what is practiced in the name of psychiatry under the leadership of the professors of the University of Turku, these more than 50 witnesses cannot be trusted at all because their ability to lead and manipulate minor children is extremely great and they practically get what they want out of these balls.

 

 

Conviction for sexual crimes

"Auer was sentenced for, among other things, two counts of aggravated rape and three counts of aggravated child abuse."

 

"Accomplice, Auer's ex-boyfriend Jens Rurik Kukka, was sentenced to ten years in prison for similar crimes."

 

I don't directly mind Auer's sexual crime convictions for the sake of justice, because she murdered her husband and received about 550,000 euros from the state office, but was Jens Kukka really guilty of these convictions because it seems very much like a completely innocent person was put in the castle for sexual crimes and this would not even have been said unfounded in any way when you look at how the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court reject the police's almost open-ended criminal investigations, which means that some criminals are sentenced for completely wrong reasons. It is a long way from here that in Finland innocent people are sentenced to prison with completely unfounded expert opinions, which I am afraid happened in Kuka's case, because there is no trust in the fairness of court decisions in Finland.

 

But no conviction for murder

Auer's and Kuka's sexual crimes in connection with the murder of Jukka S. Lahti appear to be mostly staged, and what can the Finnish power elite do at best when the higher courts are at their command, a good example of which is the case of Jyrki Järvilehto.

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-6398113

 

This is an extremely scary activity if in Finland they start convicting innocent people for crimes they did not commit but who are falsified with expert opinions such as those given by the psychiatrists of the friend club of the University of Turku and even in the Court of Appeal of Turku. I'm pretty sure that the judgments of the Court of Appeal in Turku should all be overturned because the Finnish judiciary is simply no longer capable of impartial or fair sentencing, where clear evidence made by the police is invalidated in the face of expert opinions, which are based only on opinions.

 

The authorities' motives for Auer's sexual crimes

The project launched by Leif Sevoni, Tarja Halonen and Johannes Koskinen, with which our country's courts are completely put to the use of those in power, through which dictator-like judgments can be handed down without being blamed for the perfect facades created and built for our decision-makers in the media, which is an achievement worthy of a hat-off from YLE's propaganda machine.

 

The use of this dictatorship in our country is based on the complete unpredictability of judgments, which makes it possible for judgments handed down in complete violation of the rule of law and the rule of law to pass randomly, of which Auer's case is the most egregious in Finland so far.

 

The randomness and unpredictability is indeed dizzying in Auer's case and what state Sevon got our judiciary in with the judicial murder of Eveliina Lappalainen.

 

The motive is to convict innocent people accused of sexual crimes in the future

In my eyes, Auer has not committed any of these accused crimes even though she murdered her husband. These judgments create a path to a nominal rule of law where innocent people can then be sentenced for sexual crimes if that is the only way to do it, where the statements of psychiatrists and psychologists from the University of Turku are used in court, which would seem to go by throwing through the corrupt courts of our country, which rejects even a moderate criminal investigation by the police with completely unfounded and arbitrary pretexts, which seems to be the action very popular in Uganda, where Patrian sent Tuomas Teräsvuori to sell expensive military equipment to poor tribal chiefs.

https://www.finnishcrimereporter.com/operation-linden-s-trip

 

The motive transfers power to expert opinions in psychiatry

In Auer's sexual crime case, the number of experts, which was more than 50, was incredible in its massiveness. This kind of activity is already almost unbelievable, which also partly reveals the imaginary nature of sexual crimes, which is tried to be pushed by a large army of psychologists so that it would go through in court. It's really sad to see how something like this goes through the courts!!! FUCK !!! with expert opinions that completely lack all realities and concreteness, but then they reject very clear criminal investigations and statements made by the police based on clear evidence from the crime scene, such as Jukka S. Lahti's blood outside the building. These criminal investigations and statements made by the police have been very reliable up until the case of Jouni Kauppila, when the police gave in to corruption and started giving biased statements, which seems to be the custom of the country.

 

This action is the result when the reliability of the police and the moderation of criminal investigations have wiped the ass in the courts, which has weakened its morality and justice to a large extent, because why play in the name of justice because our country has been turned in its corruption to the level of Uganda, which means wrongly convicted persons in the courts.

 

This action, which transferred power and credibility to the expert opinions of psychiatry, is an absolute prerequisite in modern Finland, when psychiatry buys its own human rats from roaming our streets through the courts with their own biased expert opinions, where there is great value in growing the careers of our own academic researchers at the expense of the freedom and health of these human rats.

 

The motive is to make the courts completely unpredictable in terms of sentencing

If this succeeds, it is easy for the people to take the path of justice with their own hands, which in Finland does not mean street patrols beating up individual criminals, but street patrols that look for and stage our country's problem citizens in mental hospitals in the name of mental health problems, because this would seem to be a clear path in our rule of law, which goes through in court with psychiatric expert opinions if the accused even has something recorded in the psychiatric from clinics to their own credibility, where they are lured to go with the positive advertising of YLE's propaganda machine, and what they are lobbied with the help of numerous state-funded organizations such as Mieli ry.

 

However, state funding is not necessarily the only one, because in our country there is a lift Herlin, who has a big voice in the media and who in the news is announcing access to treatment for problem youth with a doomsday voice.

 

In the name of these mental health problems, any innocent citizen can be sentenced to a mental hospital in the name of impunity when he has been made to commit a "crime" in our society and for which nothing more is needed than self-destruction in connection with a traffic accident, which means a place in a mental hospital with forced treatment.

https://www.ts.fi/uutiset/4039058

 

The motive is to make the courts dictatorial

If you look at the court's decisions to expert opinions, the dictator-like approach is already 100% when it rejects evidence from the police's criminal investigation, which, however, is based very much on the concrete and physical traces from the crime scene and accepts psychologists' statements told by the mouths of minor children. Psychologists of the same university who play a big role when the modern-day witch hunt has been successfully launched in our country, in the name of which our problem citizens can be gathered from the lobbies of the coil to mental hospitals with biased statements as human rats "psychosis" for use by the researchers of Hietala's www.pronia.eu team.

 

This action by the courts is an abuse of power in the context of crimes, which should be addressed immediately and the persons who have thus misused their power in the courts should be condemned.

 

WRONG JUDGMENTS IN US ARE BLESSED BY THE WORD OF CORRUPT PROFESSORS

In the cases I have studied, there are clear features of how the words of highly educated professors bless these injustices in the Finnish media. What makes me wonder the most is how this action does not cause an opening in any professional in our society in terms of consistent lines, where the best example is given by medical professionals regarding the murder of Jimi Karttunen, which was carried out at HUS and which was covered up as a post-trauma metabolic reaction and blessed with lawyer-like bad treatment where the blame was shifted to the patient because he was a "drug abuser" which are all medicine's own creations.

 

Do state decision-makers have such a large influence on our society that no law representative simply dares to open up in front of these cases for fear of losing their job, which is funded by taxpayers' money, which is strictly subject to regulation by our country's decision-makers, which is used to finance and support the trials of YLE's propaganda machine's own child, Jessikka Aro, and others who work for the state .

 

This activity is removed from the possibilities of ordinary citizens to be heard in court when the authorities have targeted them with unfair actions in their own positions, the best example of which is the death of Jimi Karttusen at HUS and the injustices directed at Jouni Kauppila.

 

Matti Tolvanen

Matti Tolvanen, who is a bought professor, literally when he is defending the release of Auer, who was nevertheless convicted in the district court. If Tolvanen represented justice, he would defend the district court's decision in the name of justice, because the criminal investigation by the Finnish police and the evidence all support the showdown that grew out of a family dispute where "weapons" were simply dug up, which has been very normal human behavior throughout the ages and which Keravan Auervaara is trying to shift to the side of mental illness.

https://www.is.fi/kotimaa/art-2000000881161.html

 

Tolvanen, who brought up the Järvilehto case in the link, in fact gave me a new topic that fully supports the fact that in Finland the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court are so close to the power elite that it can influence verdicts and, if necessary, reject them against the completely open-ended criminal investigations conducted by the police with the strangest questionings that are not there is no basis or any proof.

https://www.mtvuutiset.fi/artikkeli/taman-nayn-poliisit-kohtasivat-jarvilehdon-turmapaikalla/2058498

 

This action by our judiciary is a clear sign of its inaction, which backfires on the common citizen. In Auer's case, he received huge compensations and a conviction for sexual crimes instead of murder, so this trickery by the power elite with the people's deception turned everything on Auer's side financially, but which will be taken up again sometime when Finland is returned to the rule of law.

 

Terttu Utriainen uni.lapland and Dan Frände uni.hel

"Two experienced legal scholars praise the nearly four-page public statement in which the Court of Appeal of Turku sheds light on the reasons for the prison sentences of Anneli Auer and Jens Kuka."

https://www.ts.fi/uutiset/503148

 

If I could say something to this brain fart of Utriainen and Frände

 so my report on Auer is already 20 pages long, so how could the ALMOST 4-page statement of the court of appeals in Turku be worth praising? Is this statement also a condition for these professors to keep their jobs?

​

 

THE IMPACT OF THE AUER CASE ON OUR SOCIETY AND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

Leif Sevon's dirty work, which can be seen in Auer's case

It is obvious that Halonen's chosen Leif Sevon has succeeded in what Halonen wanted from him, i.e. to take over our courts for the use of those in power, which is carried out by reputable, highly educated and high-ranking persons who are on the tight leash of the decision-makers, whose reward is the popularity of the decision-makers

 

This action, of course, has crushed our rule of law completely, even though the police's actions here were moderate, although with their experience in similar cases, they should have been able to perform better. However, the end result was that the murderer was found and the material collected by the police is indisputable, although our courts do not want to see this, they act against all justice and the word of the police, who have done and collected reliable evidence for a murder verdict, albeit late

 

Based on this, we can say that our judiciary and our courts do not represent justice or the rule of law, but an official dictatorship where the authorities and people in high positions do the dirty work that our decision-makers want in the courts. In this case, high-ranking judges pass sentences as they please and let murderers go free on high bail.

 

Psychiatry that takes advantage of the people's anger caused by injustice

I can't help but see the current state of Finnish medical care as a temporal continuum, the main purpose of which has been to turn our court into a completely unpredictable place in the eyes of the people when it comes to judgments, which are nevertheless very clear.